Hello,
Looking to do the following on a cheap budget for a farm bound friend who is currently burning dinosaurs (geny) at a rate that makes me cringe.
120-130A/hr dc usage at 12V a day
so he likes 12v because he understands it so being a remote farm i want to keep it 12v nominal at the batts.
I can get 175w victron 12v panels locally too was going to wire 3 in parallel down to a dc breaker then to solar regulator. (will make leads esy to follow for him and ill use colour shrink on pv cables so he can easily identify the pos/neg of each panel should he need to remove one as result of damage.
so i was going for
3 x 175 victron mono panels Reference No. SPM041751200
bluesolar PWM yes PWM (remember cheap) sub tropical location too has display and charge his phone via usb thus (Saving $200 over the MPPT this covered the 3rd panel) I figured 525watts via PWM would outperform 350watts via MPPT.
800w victron inverter
360 a/h battery bank
12/30 victron charger
I know its only 3 days carry over only but he must run a stock pump for a few hrs every few days so ive added a victron 12/30 battery charger so when hes burning dinosaurs he can top up bank if required .
so thats back ground for you all
now to my question ... the PWM says 36 cell panels are best used but the 12v victron panels are 72 cell even though they are 12 v ??? are these still suitable ??
Am i silly to use the PWM ..after reading the white paper and everything else I could find it seems that 12v nominal systems are the go right up the 30A limit which will be right on for him. and as said the $200 saved has paid for the additional 175 watts.
cable runs all calculated for less than 3% voltage loss more like 1-1.5% as everything is pretty close together.
all fusing and breakers are dc rated so all covered on the saftey front.
Just that lingering 36 v 72 cell 12v panel question.
I could buy 2nd hand 24v pv panels and the MPPT but after many hre drive to set this up remote Id rather give him good new gear from victron and ensure I he has no issues.
thoughts
Future expansion is not and going to happen .... and 240v ac usage will always be kept to bare minium hence the smaller inverter.
Thanks for reading