question

rgrver avatar image
rgrver asked

Calulating amp-hours from MPPT watt-hours?

I turned off my MPPT for several days and let my 100 Ah LiFePO get down to 13.1v with a small load. Turned solar back on and waited until it reached float stage (2+ days later). My MPPT stats say it took 1060 watt-hours to get back to full charge.

Now, I know watts are IxV. However, what should I use as "V" to calculate the total Ah needed to get back to full charge? Actually, the difference between 13.1 and 14.0 is only about 5 Ah (81 VS. 76), but I'm curious.

Thanks,
Ralph

MPPT SmartSolar
2 comments
2 |3000

Up to 8 attachments (including images) can be used with a maximum of 190.8 MiB each and 286.6 MiB total.

klim8skeptic avatar image klim8skeptic ♦ commented ·

Winston use 3.3v per cell.20201006-171516.jpg

0 Likes 0 ·
20201006-171516.jpg (363.8 KiB)
rgrver avatar image rgrver commented ·

@klim8skeptic

Took me awhile to see why you posted the photo. :) Thanks for it.

Ralph

0 Likes 0 ·
1 Answer
Alexandra avatar image
Alexandra answered ·

@RgRVer

On lifepo4 you cannot use voltage at all to tell state of charge or used AH as their discharge curve it so flat and there is little difference between charged and flat voltage.

The difference of almost 1v can represent 50 to 100ah.

The formula for conversion is WH/V = AH.

1060 / 13 = 81AH (maybe slightly less as the voltage rises during charge and i assume you still had your load conneted at the same time?)

So your battery was 80% discharged if you charged up with no other loads connected.

Your battery full will have 100AH x 14v = 1040WH total capacity. This also it not cut and dried especially if you are not drawing the the c rating of the battery and of course the temperature the battery is installed in.



1 comment
2 |3000

Up to 8 attachments (including images) can be used with a maximum of 190.8 MiB each and 286.6 MiB total.

rgrver avatar image rgrver commented ·


@Alexandra

Thanks for the info. I was aware of the flat discharge curve. Using 13 volts as an approximation makes sense.

Thanks, Ralph

0 Likes 0 ·