VRM Portal Device List – A Touch of Perfectionism and Accuracy

Q&A and troubleshooting
, , , ,
1

In the device list, the role assignment and module numbering are not displayed correctly for a single-phase parallel configuration.
While this has no impact on system operation, it would be good to see the actual values represented correctly.

Screen_Dev_List
Screen_Dev_List985×1052 46.2 KB

A small request: it would be useful to add a basic Ve.Bus widget that displays the load distribution for each module. During commissioning, all balancing measurements are carried out using test equipment, but it would be helpful to have a telemetry timeline available during operation.

Thank you.

2

So you have 4 MultiPlus and all are in parallel on one phase?

3

Yep

4

Ok, I forward it to the VRM team so they can take a look at it.

5

Thanks, @M_Lange ! :wink:

6

does it show up correctly on the venus os ?

whats the vrm id ?

7

Hi Frank,
Thank you for the quick response.

There are no local anomalies, nor could there be any.
All of my systems are configured correctly and are operating flawlessly without any issues.

My point was that the identification and presentation of the installation configuration data in VRM for this particular installation does not reflect the actual system configuration.

I also made a small suggestion regarding the expansion of telemetry capabilities for all users.

Installation ID: 973427

The actual unit roles are as follows:

Master – $7A39BC6E
Slave 1 – $7A39BC20
Slave 2 – $7A39A464
Slave 3 – $7A39C30A