Hello.
Yes, you are correct, it is in alphabetical order (v3.70). I did not check that, good to know.
However: For certain arrangements switches in alphabetical order are not desirable, they very much need to be arrangable in a logical order.
I am running into all kinds of limitations (see my other posts, would especially be great to get some input in regards to charger limit/DVCC) - limitations which I think are so unnecessary, because it seems to be so basic what is needed/demanded.
If only alphabetical woks as of today, I wonder about two things:
1st: Did you guys not consider that alphabetical might be the wrong order from a logical switch arrangement perspective? All other software usually has something like a “weight” setting for a visual element - simple and effective.
2nd: Will there be an update, is the usefulness of an order-option aside from alphabetical recognized? I mean, I could name my switches 1-name, 2-name, etc. But how shall that look on the end-user screen, not very professional from my perspective.