6 x 20kV Multiplus = 2 per phase :: Does this make sense? Or do I go with an HV system rather

I would rather use Victron but this seems to be pushing the envelope - compared to a Deye HV system?

Assuming I can accommodate 30 x 625w Ja Solar Bi-Facial Panels + 88 x 460w JA Solar Bi-Facial Panels

Across: 15 Strings to 5 x 450 MPPT’s (based on limited roof space)

I require at least 100KVA during peak usage for 3 hours - so my plan is to use 6 x 20Kv Multi-plus, 2 per phase.

Comments or recommendations welcomed please.

I have never done a series or even parallel Inverters before - Is there a Master Inverter that manages the charge/load ESS settings? If there is an over-load situation which Inverter trips or do they all?

Battery pack suggestions please? Needing 120kWh - so for now assuming I am thinking 2 x stacks of Deye BOS-B 61.4kWh per stack. Can Victron Cerbo or Erkano GX talk to a Deye BOS-B BMS system?

Click & Design attached with my own layout pic

report-Ships Bell-2026-07-08T23_41.pdf (7.8 MB)

Notes appreciated. I fully recognise my own limitations - hence this discussion AND I shall be using the largest Victron agent / Reseller in the Eastern Cape - that has been in the game for over 10 years to do the full install.

That said - again you did not answer any one of the questions

  1. Is the design technically feasible ?

  2. Do 6 x 20kW Multiplus units in Series/Parralell actually work as reliably as a stand-alone Multiplus in real-life ?

  3. Is the BOS-B battery stack compatible with the Gx or Erkano or what would you recommend in the 120kWh space?

180kVa and 240kVa systems exist and are being built with DC coupling and ac coupling. (Even larger with the microgrid now)

Is it possible, yes.
Are they more complex than DEYE, yes.

Feasibility usually comes down to customers whether they want the Victron or not.
Or how well you can sell the system based on Victrons merits such as integration and monitoring.

This is sounding more like a sales and product choice problem than a design or build problem

I strongly advise you to seek advise from a local engineer firm specialised in this field, on the scale of this project there will be many pitfalls you will fall into.

However, we are here on this forum to learn from each other, but many experts here do not participate in that.

You understand what @CraigK wants, don’t you?

If we approach this properly, comprehensive input data and competent consultancy on system architecture selection are essential.

The preliminary phase, comprising an engineering audit, a techno-economic feasibility study, and selection of the primary equipment package, would cost from €2K for a project of this nature.

And that’s before we even discuss the cost of producing the design documentation itself, which typically starts at around €200 per installed kW.

Following equipment supply come installation, site supervision, commissioning, and putting the system into operation, all of which incur additional costs.

Comprehensive commercial-sector solutions simply cannot be delivered without these stages.

UPD: I’ve just opened the engineering design package for a project of comparable scale and focus, it comprises 60 pages of drawings, visualisations, technical specifications and cost estimates. That’s in case anyone’s wondering what design documentation actually means.

In my humble opinion, building a system this size using low-voltage inputs (48V battery, 450V max on PV) is not a great idea. It can be done, of course, but there are better options. We love Victron around here, but they have fallen behind the rest of the world in efficient products for large systems. The products Victron has announced, but yet to release, get them partially there, but are already 3-4 years too late. (I.e. the HS19 with all of its limitations).

The Chinese manufacturers make good hardware, but their software is by and large just terrible. Victron could be a leader in this space (software) but they are going to be hindered by their hardware for some time to come. And that’s assuming they actually want to play in the large installation space. They may not, and thats ok. I wish I were wrong, because it would help my business to use Victron products more widely. So in my opinion, I would look for HV solutions and wrap some better software around it. You could use Home Assistant, for example, to make pretty dashboards and automations using the Chinese products if that helps.

I designed a system similar to this for an automotive company wanting reliable power for an AI compute farm. They wanted Victron. I told them I could engineer it, but I could also engineer a more efficient and less complex solution using products better suited to their need. They insisted, paid me a decent amount of money to engineer it, took it back to senior leaders, who asked the right questions and promptly nixed the idea. Even though I was right, they saw me as promoting a solution that ultimately wasn’t the right choice and I lost all the business. That’s also partly because I didn’t have access to the ultimate decision makers in the first place: A rookie sales mistake :slight_smile:

All the advise from everyone is much appreciated

No-one has actually said its a good idea - so HV it will need to be

  1. it’s not uncommon for a new topic to be posted here about a large ess installation or a complex problem that never receive a single response or answer, these Victron customers wil be very disappointed with Victron response here; at least anwer with ‘that we cannot resolve the problem from a tablet, ask a for an experienced local Victton specialist’ … and not with a demoralising answer.

  2. with ESS installations you have to deal with a another major factor: national and local regulations. Nobody on this forum knows all those regulations, not even Victron itself, this is often the reason why a question cannot be answered wthout knowledge of these regulations…therefore, the same answer applies here: ask a local Victron specialist.

  3. but then, what is a Victron “specialist”? It should be clear that an experienced DIY installer could have more experience then a newly established ‘pro’ full-time installer with only 2 completed 1 phase ess installations.. and yes those inexperienced pro Installers ask here on this forum about a technical problem (and expect a free anwer!)

  4. Every (pro) installer once started with their first ess installation, learning by making more and larger ess installations and frome the mistakes made.

Translation by Google

Let’s start with the main point: it’s important to distinguish between levels of qualification and responsibility. There are engineers, and there are installers.

The design of both large-scale and smaller electrical systems is always carried out by engineers. They produce the complete design documentation, based on which the installers carry out all work exactly as calculated and specified in the design, and as approved by the client.

A design engineer’s qualification specifically includes knowledge of the relevant standards, local statutory requirements, as well as the specifications and installation requirements issued by manufacturers of various equipment and components.

Installers, in turn, are expected to be able to read design documentation and carry out installation work to a high standard, in full compliance with the applicable standards, requirements, and equipment specifications.

Personally, I have no difficulty familiarising myself with the local regulatory requirements of any country, as they all either supplement or clarify IEC standards. In fact, I have completed several projects located tens of thousands of kilometres away from where I am based. While my design engineer’s licence is not valid in those jurisdictions, the adaptation of the completed design-essentially the formal confirmation of its compliance with local requirements - was delegated to a local engineering company, which handled the necessary administrative procedures and certification.

The client is free to appoint any contractor they choose to carry out the installation, provided the work is based on the approved design documentation.

Supervision of the works is an optional service, and whether it is required is entirely the client’s decision. It ultimately comes down to the contractor’s competence and the client’s confidence in the quality of their work.

Nobody on forums is going to teach all these procedures or delve into the specifics of every individual case. This is professional work, and nobody is going to do it for someone else free of charge. That’s why I always say that everyone should focus on their own area of expertise and take responsibility for the obligations they undertake.


UPD: More than that, if @CraigK thinks Deye’s all-in-one HV equipment is a simple, straightforward solution that will tick every box, I can shatter those illusions.

He’s in for so many surprises that he hasn’t even begun to imagine, especially at those power levels.

There is good reason we don’t encourage these design questions for large systems on the community.
Please use a qualified and experienced supplier to help, they have built and help design these large systems many times before.
This is not the place for it.
An error in a small system is problematic, an error at this scale can be fatal.