Hi all,
I’m looking for guidance/experience with a fully islanded system using several independent three-phase Quattro battery systems on one common AC bus.
The proposed arrangement is:
- 3 independent BESS clusters
- Each cluster has 3 × Quattro 48/10000/140-100/100 120 V, configured as a three-phase 120/208 V VE.Bus system
- Each cluster has its own battery bank and Cerbo GX
- BESS #1 would be the designated grid-forming / black-start system
- A small DC generator is connected to the DC bus of BESS #1, together with its battery bank
- BESS #2–#3 would operate as grid-following systems
- An external controller would provide active-power, and ideally reactive-power, commands to BESS #2–#3
- The common 120/208 V islanded AC bus also has:
- AC-coupled PV inverters (grid following)
- an AC-coupled wind inverter (grid following)
- site loads
I understand that the current s97 Victron Microgrid / Hybrid Droop application is intended for multiple Victron Power Banks sharing the bus through droop control, but the current documentation does not support AC-coupled PV/wind or other additional AC generation on that same Microgrid bus.
Because PV and wind need to remain connected to the common AC bus, I am investigating whether a master/follower architecture using standard VE.Bus / ESS Mode 3 is a better approach.
I would really appreciate input on the following:
- Has anyone successfully operated one Quattro system as the island grid-former and multiple completely independent Quattro systems as grid-following followers using ESS Mode 3 or another external-control method?
- For that architecture, would the normal arrangement be:
- grid-forming system supplying the common bus from AC-OUT-1
- follower systems connected to the same bus through their AC-IN?
- Can the follower systems be reliably commanded to charge/discharge through their AC-IN while another independent Quattro system is forming the bus?
- Has anyone operated this type of master/follower arrangement with AC-coupled PV or wind on the same bus?
- Were there stability problems when the grid-forming Quattro used frequency shifting?
- Is direct external curtailment of the PV/wind inverters preferable to frequency shifting in this type of system?
- For Quattro 48/10000/140-100/100 120 V, which firmware path would be appropriate for this architecture?
- standard firmware such as 2754556.vff
- or 2754561-s97.vff with Microgrid operation disabled
- If s97 firmware is installed but Microgrid operation is disabled, can the system use the ESS Assistant / Mode 3 external-control functions, or does the s97 requirement for Grid Code “None” prevent that?
I have found a few Community discussions where a central inverter forms the island and other ESS systems operate as externally controlled followers, including Mode 3 examples, but I’m trying to understand whether this can be made reliable with multiple three-phase follower systems plus AC-coupled renewables on the same island bus.
Thanks in advance for any practical experience or guidance.