# Recurring Reports - Admin oversight

**URL:** <https://community.victronenergy.com/t/recurring-reports-admin-oversight/64295>\
**Category:** DIY\
**Tags:** vrm\
**Created:** [23 October 2026 09:13 UTC](https://community.victronenergy.com/t/recurring-reports-admin-oversight/64295 "2026-10-23T09:13:42Z")\
**Posts on this page:** 2\
**Page:** 1

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![DS4AUK](https://avatars.discourse-cdn.com/v4/letter/d/b5a626/32.png) [@DS4AUK](https://community.victronenergy.com/u/DS4AUK)\
**Post date:** [23 October 2026 09:13 UTC](https://community.victronenergy.com/t/recurring-reports-admin-oversight/64295/1 "2026-10-23T09:13:42Z")

</div>

The Admin users of an installations appear not to be able to view a recurring report created by another user (in this case a technician user).  
Is this by design.  
Would it be possible to ensure Admin / Technician users have full system oversight, including recurring reports that have been created by others.

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![Buzzy](https://dub1.discourse-cdn.com/victron/user_avatar/community.victronenergy.com/buzzy/32/54803_2.png) [@Buzzy](https://community.victronenergy.com/u/Buzzy)\
**Post date:** [25 October 2026 18:55 UTC](https://community.victronenergy.com/t/recurring-reports-admin-oversight/64295/2 "2026-10-25T18:55:55Z")

</div>

Perhaps add the tag “feature-request” to your messages about new capabilities. It’s more likely to get seen.